🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has stated it is pursuing damages amounting to $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This move represents a clear response by the Kremlin against proposals to use immobilized Russian sovereign assets to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

According to accounts in local news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the stated $230 billion demand.

EU leaders will decide later this week regarding a proposal to use around €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. The proposal involves providing Ukraine with a large loan to fund its defence and economic stability.

Most of these funds, totaling €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the main keeper for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth.

A Clash Over Legality

European Union authorities have maintained that their proposal is on solid legal ground. They argue is based on the principle that title of the state assets still belongs to Russia, even though it was frozen in EU jurisdictions shortly after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has called any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened retaliatory measures, including confiscating European corporate holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a prominent position in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and regain its assets. He warned that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

With statements interpreted as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the proposal as "a vicious attack on property rights and the international reserves system established by the United States."

The clearing house declined to comment on the latest legal action. The institution has in the past stated it is facing over 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

While courts in EU countries are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, experts expect Moscow to seek enforcement in nations with closer ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that such holdings can be located," commented a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities indicated they are working on steps to discourage other nations from aiding any Russian legal action against European companies. Additionally, they are crafting safeguards to shield EU member states with assets in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the complex scheme, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would remain unaffected.

Ukraine would only be obligated to return the money if and when Russia agreed to pay reparations for the vast damage inflicted during the nearly four-year war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This entails common EU borrowing to secure a loan, using unused funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, nevertheless, demands full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, said the reparations loan as "the most credible solution" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it doesn't come from our public funds, which is equally significant," she remarked. "It also sends a clear signal that when you cause all this destruction to another country, you must pay for the rebuilding."